IRF case study: crisis communication in four phases

03.01.2025

1. Background

A globally active, listed software company found itself in crisis at the beginning of 2024 when a short seller published serious allegations. The allegations centered on the company's financial transparency and business practices. They posed a serious challenge to its reputation. The short seller launched his broadside a few days before key communication dates, including the publication of the annual report and the Investor Day. 

2. The challenge

In the minutes following the publication of the allegations, the software company's share price fell by around 30 percent. The company faced the dual challenge of countering the immediate reputational damage and finding the best way to deal with the serious allegations in view of the upcoming events. The crisis team had to act quickly to maintain trust while carefully managing the messages to avoid aggravating the situation. 

 

Key questions arose from a communications perspective: 

  • What kind of crisis was it, and what strategy would be most effective? 
  • How do you protect your own reputation while addressing the concerns of investors and the media? 
  • What key messages are relevant to investors and the media in an initial statement? 
  • Should the software company give media interviews, and if so, when and how? 
  • How should the company deal with the allegations during the scheduled events? 

>> The response: The company acted decisively and implemented a structured crisis communications strategy to provide immediate and informative answers. 

 

3. Immediate response

Around five hours after the publication of the short seller's report, the software company published an initial statement. The statement was carefully worded and contained a summarised refutation of the allegations. This gave the company time to conduct a more thorough internal investigation before publishing a more detailed response. The company also announced a comprehensive investigation of the allegations by external specialists.  

It focused on maintaining the confidence of its investors. The software company confirmed its financial forecast and emphasised its strong free cash flow. It avoided mentioning the short seller by name or arguing publicly, instead letting the figures speak for themselves. 

A few days after the first statement, the company published a second, more detailed response. The Chairman of the Board of Directors also gave interviews to the key media to put the news in context and to substantiate the arguments. 

The results of the internal investigation were published two months after the attack. They confirmed the integrity of the company. The in-depth investigation emphasised the company's commitment to transparency. 

 4. Findings

Speed and structure in the reaction 

The ability to issue an initial, well-founded statement within a few hours was crucial. The rapid response signalled that the company wanted to and was able to regain control of the interpretation. 

Transparency and thoroughness 

The rapid announcement of a thorough investigation demonstrated the company's commitment to transparency. 

Controlled media strategy 

Through careful, fact-based communication, the company was able to avert further damage and lay the foundations for gradually regaining the trust of the market. 

 

The case of the software company shows how crisis management can be successfully implemented through rapid action, thorough investigation and careful, consistent communication.  

 

Contact for crisis communication:

 

We look forward to new challenges and to you getting in touch.

 

IRF Reputation AG
Rämistrasse 4
CH-8024 Zurich
+41 43 244 81 44
info@irf-reputation.ch
www.irf-reputation.ch

IRF Reputation in Zürich

IRF Reputation AG
Rue du Commerce 4
CH-1204 Geneva
+41 43 244 81 44
info@irf-reputation.ch
www.irf-reputation.ch

IRF Reputation in Genf